Cutruzzula & Nalducci

At one time I was a young successful entrepreneur with a credit score of 761. Due to being misrepresented in a frivolous matter and taking care of my grandma the business fell apart. Now that I have re-established my credit I called to get assistance in business Re-development . However I have outsanding matters that need adressed before investing time or money in redevelopment - Civil Rights . After making complaint that code enforcement is showing favoritism. In retaliation USC Twp goes to great lengths to remove 1 of my dogs- accuses me of running a kennel, and a home business for having 4 dogs. It is also their argument that no one in USC with under 5 achers can have more than 3 pets for the safety of the animal. The argument is 1. under USC own definition of Utility Animal , my dog would not be a pet. 2 Under states and federal definitions my dogs would not be a pet. 3. Does a Twp have the right to re-define Pennsylvania definitions ( Kennel). 4. Even if my dogs were pets. The city of Pittsburgh allowes 5 pets per house along with neighboring and surrounding communities. . Case log ex . Carnegie vs. Mary Creighton. 5. There are multiple "home business" in my neighborhood along with outstanding saftey violations that still after years of neglect need adressed.. Ex. Trees , Guide Rails, etc. - Estate Inheritance , administration , along with damages from neighbors, and shotty contracting. - Insurance Claims There was a lack of interest during the brief consultation . I was told it wasn't worth hiring representation I wont get anything , but was also told they will keep their fingers crossed. In regards to the responce to the complaints and advise given to me. What is the point in having laws and procedures that protect animals if there is nothing that will be done when they are broken?