Preston was extremely helpful, kind, communicative, and professional. I really appreciated his knowledge and attention to detail. I am very grateful that I found Preston and that he so graciously took my case. I would highly recommend using this law firm if you find yourself in need of a great lawyer.
Many years ago, we used Mr. Fry’s services to get full custody of my husbands children. Everything he promised, he did it! He is a great guy and a fantastic attorney.
The only thing you should expect from this firm is a big bill and a loss. Completely incompetent, the facts were all in our favor but the 'lawyer' from this firm Preston Bennett didn't even object when the other side was committing open, easily provable perjury.
This law firm is incompetent. They allowed themselves to be illegally forced out of mediation by a pro se opposition, the first of many idiotic decisions. Then during court didn't object to obvious and blatantly purgery. Didn't object to the judge not allowing us to talk. Then after the judge ruled based on the obvious purgery (that Preston allowed to stand unopposed). Preston Bennott stated that this should not have...
This law firm is incompetent. They allowed themselves to be illegally forced out of mediation by a pro se opposition, the first of many idiotic decisions. Then during court didn't object to obvious and blatantly purgery. Didn't object to the judge not allowing us to talk. Then after the judge ruled based on the obvious purgery (that Preston allowed to stand unopposed). Preston Bennott stated that this should not have happened and that we would pay a flat fee for an appeal as it was such an obvious wrong ruling. We then got a bill twice as high as we agreed on and a we tried to discuss the bill he filed his brief to the appeals court, and refused to talk to us again stating through his secretary that he never said it would be a flat fee. We sent emails and asked questions about the brief and the bill. The only response we got was the firm withdrawing from the law suit. As for the brief, it was incoherent rambeling,so much so that the appeals court sided with a judge that allowed purgery and a lying pro se Karen that had no evidence of her claims that just used emotions to plead her case.