Nat Kidder Law, P.A.

Acting as an advocate, Guardian at Litem, he resembled more of his prosecutorial days. He wasnt plugged into the case and failed to perform GAL duties according to GAL.org. He made decisions, gave opinions, and advice contrary to normal standards of ethics and went against the mental health professional opinions. Kidder did not follow up with his minor clients, instead he disparaged the parents involved, created unsubstantiated opinions based on meritless allegations. Furthermore he went against code of conduct ethics and discriminated against one parent based on personality and went so far as to change a equal time share recommendation, contrary to the Social Worker on the case, because of a call made to him expressing dissatisfaction with Mr Kidders performance. He is spiteful He is not an advocate, he is not objective and lets his emotions decide his publications. His opinions are meritless. He favors one parent over the other. His work reveals this.He will suffer a complaint to the Florida Bar.