I have a clear documented pattern of police and mayor misconduct, the Judge not recusing herself with an ongoing case. I have screenshots of emails, proof an officer threatened my friend to take a post down after they were caught getting rid of witnesses statements and evidence because it has the chief of police accepting favors and agreeing to talk to the prosecutor to put in a "good word" on...
I have a clear documented pattern of police and mayor misconduct, the Judge not recusing herself with an ongoing case. I have screenshots of emails, proof an officer threatened my friend to take a post down after they were caught getting rid of witnesses statements and evidence because it has the chief of police accepting favors and agreeing to talk to the prosecutor to put in a "good word" on my stalkers behalf, admitted on the audio clip that he received my complaint against the department but it was never sent to the prosecutor, has messages from the chief who told me to violate my own no contact order... But some how they couldn't help with all the violations, and because of this the stalker CONTINUES to violate the CSPO against him. I did find out that lawyers don't handle the complex cases like attorneys so I'll be looking into that ave. Good luck to everyone, I had no idea how much injustice there was and how with physical proof it's still not an easy situation for everyone.
I had an extremely positive experience with Subodh Chandra over the course of several conversations across three years. He initially reviewed my case and was interested in assisting, but changes in one of his existing cases ultimately prevented him from taking it. Even so, he remained generous with his time and attention and did not forget the underlying facts of the case. Before the appellate phase, Subodh and his colleague...
I had an extremely positive experience with Subodh Chandra over the course of several conversations across three years. He initially reviewed my case and was interested in assisting, but changes in one of his existing cases ultimately prevented him from taking it. Even so, he remained generous with his time and attention and did not forget the underlying facts of the case.
Before the appellate phase, Subodh and his colleague reviewed the situation again and gave me candid, clear guidance. His assessment was not unexpected but it was disappointing to hear, particularly because it reflected the consequences of serious failures by a previous attorney, but he did not offer false reassurance or tell me what I wanted to hear. He was realistic about the limits of the law, the and the state of the case while remaining attentive to the underlying harm I experienced and the importance of justice.
We later spoke a third time, and Subodh went beyond simply offering advice. He reached out to members of his professional network in an effort to help me find assistance better aligned with my particular legal needs. Again, he expressed both compassion and a hope that I might see some measure of justice.
Throughout these interactions, he listened carefully, understood the complexity of the case, and treated me with respect and compassion. He is exceptionally smart, principled, and humane. His combination of legal realism, intellectual clarity, and a keen sense of justice is rare. I am deeply grateful for his time, honesty, and integrity.
I contacted this law firm about a constitutional and civil rights violation dealing with the courts about family being placed as jurors in a jury trial against the defendant, the secretary said it's the exact kind of case they take just for me to receive an email turning me down. They didn't even give me the opportunity to say I'd pay. Smh.