I was the opposing party in family litigation involving Patrick S. Bedard, not his client, and I disclose that so readers can weigh my perspective fairly. After nearly sixteen years of direct exposure to his work, I would not recommend him to anyone seeking candor, restraint, efficient resolution, or a genuinely child-centered approach to family law. His own firm advertises “the most aggressive representation.” My experience was exactly that—and it...
I was the opposing party in family litigation involving Patrick S. Bedard, not his client, and I disclose that so readers can weigh my perspective fairly.
After nearly sixteen years of direct exposure to his work, I would not recommend him to anyone seeking candor, restraint, efficient resolution, or a genuinely child-centered approach to family law.
His own firm advertises “the most aggressive representation.” My experience was exactly that—and it was not a virtue. I experienced repeated escalation, procedural friction, resistance to practical resolution, and an adversarial posture that increased expense and conflict while a parent-child relationship deteriorated. What may look like ordinary motion practice from a lawyer’s desk can consume years of a child’s only childhood.
This is not simply a personality disagreement. In January 2026, a former court-appointed guardian ad litem wrote to the presiding judge that a motion filed by Bedard contained “inaccuracies” and omitted later appointments that materially changed the history being presented. That restrained professional language captured a recurring concern I experienced for years: confidence without sufficient accuracy, aggression without proportion, and process treated as more important than its human consequences.
The most troubling aspect was not merely procedural. It was the lack of moral proportion when a child’s irreplaceable time was at stake. Legal work can be billed. Hearings can be continued. Court files can be closed.
A child does not get a second childhood. The harms are intergenerational.
In my experience, Bedard’s approach did not resolve conflict; it entrenched it. It did not help preserve a family; it helped turn the family into litigation terrain. Anyone considering retaining him for a family matter should understand that “aggressive” representation can leave consequences for the client, the other parent, and especially the child long after the legal work ends.
I would not retain or recommend Patrick S. Bedard.
Stop harming kids.
Attorney Bedard is an honorable and dedicated professional that, although I was on the opposite side of the court room, I found to be a pleasure to work with. Our legal system is the glue that holds us together and I appreciate his contribution to the system.
Working with Atty Bobrow was as best an experience one can have in a high conflict divorce. He kept me grounded in reality many times and saved me thousands in the long run. He understood situation I was in and met me where I was emotionally each and every time. Once he simply told me, "You're doing better than you think" and it put the divorce and my trauma into...
Working with Atty Bobrow was as best an experience one can have in a high conflict divorce. He kept me grounded in reality many times and saved me thousands in the long run. He understood situation I was in and met me where I was emotionally each and every time. Once he simply told me, "You're doing better than you think" and it put the divorce and my trauma into perspective. It resonated with me so much that I incorporated it into my parenting!
I would not hesitate to call on Atty Bobrow in the future. Good reviews brought me to him and hopefully mine can help someone out as well.